MP Raad Discusses Martyr Sayyed Nasrallah, National Sentiment, and Hezbollah – Exclusive Report

In a notable interview with Al Mayadeen, Mohammad Raad, leader of the Loyalty to the Resistance Parliamentary bloc, shared insights on the martyrdom of Hezbollah Secretary-General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah. He discussed the initial shock and subsequent weight of responsibility that ensued, highlighted Hezbollah’s renewed pledge to support Palestine in light of Israeli aggression, and recounted the organization’s steps toward recovery.

Hezbollah MP Mohammad Raad conveyed his reaction to Al Mayadeen, describing the news of the martyrdom of former Hezbollah Secretary-General, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, as an event of indescribable shock, likening it to the sensation of crash-landing from space.

Raad indicated that for hours following the assault, uncertainty persisted over whether Sayyed Nasrallah had been targeted and killed.

He noted that because of the late leader’s unwavering rule of never declaring any outcome without visual confirmation, they faced a difficult wait until the harsh reality was verified, a moment that instantly made them aware of the significant responsibilities they had inherited.

A Lebanese Member of Parliament stated that “the weight shouldered by Sayyed Nasrallah was substantial, as he bore the concerns of a nation and its paramount cause: Palestine. His efforts were centered on keeping the various factions focused on their primary goal. From the outset, we dedicated ourselves to transcending sorrow by assuming responsibility and eventually embracing it fully.”

He recounted martyr Sayyed Nasrallah’s last address during Ashura, where Nasrallah said “Until we meet again,” which Raad viewed as a definitive farewell. He perceived that Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah foresaw a severe and fierce conflict against an adversary poised to unleash its complete ruthlessness and longstanding enmity towards humanity.

In a poignant reflection, he expressed their collective shock at the loss, yet remarked that the timing of the departure seemed fitting. He noted that for the departed, witnessing the suffering of the oppressed or persecuted without the ability to intervene would have been unbearably painful.

The Israeli occupation aimed for the death of Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah to signify the dismantlement of Hezbollah and undermine the Islamic Resistance in Lebanon, an entity that has accumulated achievements over several decades. However, Raad clarified when asked about this issue that the target was actually the entire party, a fact he described as unmistakably clear.

Raad emphasized that Hezbollah recognized from the outset, in the wake of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, that the ensuing confrontation would be pivotal, intense, and severe.

He claimed evidence was shown through observed preparations, intelligence gathered on enemy developments, their adherence to recommendations from the Winograd Committee, and the direct involvement of Western powers, particularly led by the United States, in the conflict against the Gaza Strip and all resisting forces for the Palestinian cause.

 

Raad emphasized that, regardless of the actions taken by Israel, Hezbollah felt compelled from a humanitarian, ethical, and national standpoint to at least offer support and assistance to the Palestinian population in the Gaza Strip as much as possible.

He articulated that through unwavering support, the Islamic Resistance in Lebanon intended to deliver a clear message globally: neglecting assistance for Gaza and Palestine would bear repercussions for every capital in the region and unveil any entity professing to champion freedom but refraining from aiding those actively engaged in the struggle for it.

The issue extended beyond simply ideological or humanitarian concerns, according to Raad, who asserted that Hezbollah understood its position as a Resistance entity. Despite being situated on a separate front near Gaza, Hezbollah realized it was immediately targeted the moment a decision was made to go after the resistance in Gaza.

Within the same framework, the leader of the Loyalty to the Resistance bloc asserted that providing support for Gaza was the most astute decision Hezbollah has ever undertaken. This move, he stated, symbolizes a triumph for humanity, freedom, and national pride, regardless of the sacrifices involved. He emphasized that the Resistance operated in full alignment with its identity, beliefs, and values, showcasing an unparalleled dedication to the cause.

He claimed that only the indolent make excuses, placing full responsibility on those who fail to act in support of Gaza. He described the aggression against Gaza as “the most criminal, terrorist,” emphasizing its severity as surpassing the brutality associated with the Holocaust.

Raad posed a poignant inquiry, asking how we address the concerns of children globally witnessing the starvation of their peers due to milk shortages. He further questioned our response to hospitals, their proprietors, patients, medical practitioners, and nursing staff. Moreover, Raad challenged us to reflect on what we declare about institutions, urban centers, infrastructures, and communities. He asked where the indicators of vitality are that suggest coexistence with an adversary that obliterates these entities.

At the commencement of the People of Might battle, a Hezbollah representative asserted that the Israeli occupation had believed this confrontation would be a definitive one. In an attempt to deal a severe blow to Hezbollah, Israel engaged in significant actions such as the Pagers Massacre, targeting leaders of the Radwan Force, and later directing its focus on Sayyed Nasrallah.

Raad stated that the Israeli occupation, confident in its belief of delivering a decisive victory, was caught off guard as Hezbollah showcased unexpected resilience and managed to amass a considerable military presence on various fronts.

To illustrate this point, he highlighted the swift influx of fighters eager to join the battlefronts against Israeli forces in South Lebanon after the ground invasion. This overwhelming response required the establishment of checkpoints en route to the south to hold back the volunteers, as the frontlines were unable to accommodate the surge in numbers.

The main driving force, he clarified, was an unwavering dedication to the vow made to Sayyed Nasrallah to steadfastly continue the journey he had initiated and ascended as a martyr.

The leader of the Loyalty to the Resistance bloc stated that the intensity of the assault sustained by Hezbollah during its conflict with the Israeli occupation, particularly during the Support Front and the People of Might confrontations, would ordinarily be sufficient to annihilate a nation or vanquish an army.

Raad emphasized that the unity within the party is primarily sustained by a deep-rooted doctrinal loyalty and allegiance, which includes an unwavering commitment to its core principles and a sincere dedication to their implementation. He highlighted that a constructive engagement with the leadership, which exemplifies these principles and consistently adheres to them, is crucial for maintaining cohesion.

A party so unified is unlikely to face defeat, as cohesion remains paramount. Each member was acutely aware of their responsibilities from the outset, even when the party was without a secretary-general.

Raad highlighted that Hezbollah sustained a significant setback but has substantially recuperated from it. He explained that they swiftly reconstructed their organization and filled empty roles quickly, even amid the conflict. Remarkably, they managed to appoint and elect two secretaries-general in a span of just one week to ten days, a success he claimed no government or military could match.

MP Mohammad Raad emphasized that the public’s display of affection, concern, and unwavering support for the Resistance can be attributed to the foundational role of doctrine. He highlighted the belief in the leadership’s just cause and capabilities, along with the party’s skill in nurturing worthy successors to this exemplary leadership.

A Lebanese lawmaker addressed Hezbollah’s local alliances, highlighting the importance of strategic partnerships that yield both immediate and long-term national benefits. The MP delineated these interests as being divided into two categories: “partial and immediate,” and “major national ones.”

He elaborated that in its alliances and relationships, Hezbollah prioritizes long-term strategic national interests over immediate, partial gains, emphasizing that this focus is what ultimately fortifies the resilience and stability of any partnership.

The Member of Parliament highlighted a secondary aspect influencing Hezbollah’s partnerships with other Lebanese factions: transparency. The MP remarked, “Our intentions are clear when seeking agreements with others, and we conceal nothing that is not openly communicated.”

Raad emphasized a crucial element, describing it as “sincerity in commitment.” He noted, “None of our allies have ever faulted us for a lack of honesty. Instead, their concerns have revolved around our unwavering adherence to our principles. While they contend with immediate interests, they often attempt to nudge us towards compromising these steadfast values.”

According to Trump, these elements play a pivotal role in establishing a distinct model of behavior in Lebanon, setting it apart from other political entities.

Raad emphasized that the party incurs a cost for its strategic alliances, characterizing it as a temporary and current expense that ultimately garners increased support, builds greater trust, and sustains its momentum to maintain its course. During transitional phases, he noted, they address each stage based on its unique circumstances.

In further comments addressing Hezbollah’s alliances, Raad reiterated the party’s commitment to its relationship with the Amal Movement, highlighting it as a strategic partnership that transcends all other affiliations.

Hezbollah has emphasized its dedication to maintaining a unified and cohesive political environment, aligning with all entities operating within its sphere.

A Lebanese lawmaker emphasized the alliance’s strength and strategic importance, highlighting how easier mutual understanding and closer shared interests bolster its foundation. He also noted that a common doctrinal affiliation enhances this relationship, asserting that the credibility in fulfilling mutual agreements further solidifies the alliance.

The leader of the Loyalty to the Resistance bloc clarified that Hezbollah has maintained its alliances with other Lebanese parties. He emphasized that these parties retain the autonomy to make independent decisions in light of Hezbollah’s experiences stemming from Israeli aggression.

Raad emphasized Hezbollah’s unwavering commitment to maintaining its alliances, as long as they adhere to the established vision and principles. He indicated that while the players may have changed, the core tenets remain intact, with the adversary persisting as the same entity, albeit now more brutal in nature.

Hezbollah’s dedication to opposing Israeli occupation remains unwavering, according to a statement. This declaration comes despite shifts by certain parties who have reconsidered the legitimacy of the Resistance, guided by their own regional, political, and personal agendas.

Raad has asserted the legitimacy of the resistance, emphasizing that its adversaries cannot easily dismiss a recognition bestowed by the Lebanese populace more than 35 years prior. He accused these opponents of attempting to take advantage of the recent aggression’s aftermath, which “Israel” presumed would conclude Hezbollah’s influence, in order to instigate a change with a solitary, rapid political strategy.

Hezbollah’s influence continues to be robust and unmistakable, he noted, with its reach being extensive. Its institutions remain solid and evolving, while its social and political networks are active and thriving.

In statements to Al Mayadeen, a Hezbollah member of parliament pointed out that certain parties are relying on backing from both regional and international stakeholders to change and influence legislation. He cautioned that these interferences aim to undermine resolve and pose challenges to their efforts and progress.

In response to the situation, Raad declared that Hezbollah “dismisses all these efforts,” asserting that they “are destined to fail, as the party embodies the determination and will once held by the late Sayyed Nasrallah.”

The leader of the Loyalty to the Resistance bloc has emphasized the necessity for all political factions in Lebanon to engage in a comprehensive re-evaluation and reassessment amidst significant regional and international shifts and uncertainties. He highlighted that Hezbollah has already concluded its internal review and is now anticipating the completion of similar assessments by other parties.

Hezbollah’s internal strategic review, as outlined by Raad, has identified the possibility of engaging politically with various factions. The group plans to establish specific electoral alliances once there is consensus on a constitutional framework for the elections.

In response to inquiries about his potential candidacy in the forthcoming parliamentary elections, MP Mohammad Raad stated that the decision “has not been made yet, and it remains premature.”

The leader of the Loyalty to the Resistance bloc highlighted Hezbollah’s commitment to Lebanon’s internal stability, underlining that the group endures significant hardships for the country’s benefit. This dedication is aimed at maintaining the stability of the Lebanese national community and advancing the broader cause for which it seeks victory.

MP Raad acknowledged Hezbollah’s demonstration of strategic patience within Lebanon, emphasizing the party’s and its Secretary-General’s dedication to maintaining national stability as a core responsibility. He described this patience as both commendable and unique. In addition to this approach, Raad highlighted the concept of “principled patience” as practiced by individuals. He noted that martyred Sayyed Nasrallah exemplified both forms of patience.

**Read more: [Beyond Words: Understanding Sayyed Nasrallah](https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/beyond-words–understanding-sayyed-nasrallah)**

He further elaborated that this principled patience served as a deterrent for the late Sayyed Nasrallah, preventing him from acting impulsively or rushing into decisions. Nasrallah was known for only taking a stance after thorough analysis, careful consideration, and weighing the potential pros and cons.

In response to inquiries regarding attempts to incite the party into internal strife, he indicated that although the circumstances may not have reached that level of severity, there were indeed individuals with malicious intent aiming to provoke Hezbollah. Their objective appeared to be to compel the organization into actions that could damage its stellar reputation among the Lebanese populace and on the global stage.

He expressed the intention to offer an elevated ethical example to those in their sphere, aiming to share joy and reassurance in their commitments. This, he stated, would serve to persuade others of the validity and righteousness of their cause and beliefs.

In reflecting on this matter, he remembered how Sayyed Nasrallah would express intense anger if any Hezbollah member engaged in behavior that could damage the organization’s reputation. This was contrasted by the pride he took in leading battles that could result in a thousand martyrs when these conflicts were in pursuit of a just cause, justice, and the defense of the oppressed.

In recent remarks, Raad stated that there are no significant updates concerning Hezbollah’s relations with Saudi Arabia. He emphasized that the party’s primary goal, both with Saudi Arabia and other regional countries, is to ensure engagement with the Lebanese on an equal footing.

Additionally, he expressed the party’s demand for these nations to stop meddling in Lebanon’s domestic matters, urging that the Lebanese people be granted the rightful autonomy to make their own political decisions, form alliances, and decide on government initiatives.

A Lebanese MP conveyed to Al Mayadeen that there is a willingness to engage as partners if there is a consensus among all Lebanese on establishing a relationship with a certain regional party, provided that it serves mutual interests for both Lebanon and the concerned party.

Regarding the situation in Syria, the leader of the Loyalty to the Resistance bloc conveyed to Al Mayadeen that they are closely observing the changes taking place in the country. They emphasized that their stance aligns with whatever is acceptable to the Syrian populace.

He stated that the partnership with the previous Syrian administration was designed to benefit both the Syrian and Lebanese populations, prioritizing efforts to address the threat posed by Israeli aggression, which endangers Syria and Lebanon alike.

In a statement to Al Mayadeen, MP Raad conveyed that the party is closely watching developments in Syria, expressing optimism that the Syrians will attain stability, restore security, resume constitutional governance, and clarify Syria’s position on the Palestinian issue and the ongoing conflict with Israel, in addition to its stance toward certain international powers that back Zionist actions.

He pointed out that these prerequisites must be met before any thorough evaluation can take place, stressing that the current circumstances necessitate additional time.

In a concluding segment of an exclusive interview with Al Mayadeen, Mohammad Raad, the head of the Loyalty to the Resistance bloc in the Lebanese Parliament, emphasized Hezbollah’s commitment to serving the aspirations described by the Supreme Martyr as belonging to the kindest, most generous, and noblest of people. Raad stated, “We are prepared to sacrifice our lives to protect the interests and defend the rights of these individuals.”

MP Raad affirmed the solidarity between Hezbollah and its supporters, noting that they derive strength from their alliance. He articulated his conviction that as dedication to the cause championed by Martyr Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah increases, so too does their unity. Raad expressed confidence that the populace will back those who persist in following the path charted by Sayyed Nasrallah.

**Read more:** [Martyr Sayyed Nasrallah, Lebanon’s liberator, breaker of hegemony](https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/martyr-sayyed-nasrallah–lebanon-s-liberator–breaker-of-heg)