Hezbollah MP Criticizes Lebanese State’s Inaction on ‘israeli’ Violations
MP Hasan Fadlallah of Hezbollah’s Loyalty to Resistance parliamentary bloc criticized the Lebanese government for its handling of the country's economic crisis. He accused the administration of failing to address financial woes and implement necessary reforms, further exacerbating the challenges faced by citizens. Fadlallah's remarks underscore mounting frustration within the political landscape as Lebanon struggles with prolonged economic distress.
A member of Hezbollah’s Loyalty to Resistance parliamentary bloc, MP Hasan Fadlallah, has criticized the Lebanese State for its lack of response to ongoing violations of the nation’s sovereignty by Israeli attacks.
MP Fadlallah, speaking to Al-Manar on Monday, criticized the Lebanese State’s lack of action, describing it as unjustifiable. He argued that there are multiple avenues available beyond mere condemnations, suggesting that Lebanon could make political maneuvers, such as notifying the U.S. and urging it to ensure compliance by agreement parties.
A Hezbollah legislator extended condolences following the deaths of five individuals, including four members of the same family, as a result of an Israeli drone strike in Bint Jbeil on Sunday. Among the deceased were three children, two of whom were toddlers.
He expressed condolences regarding the appalling massacre and extended wishes for a swift recovery to the mother and one of her daughters, who were also injured in the attack.
The Israeli forces continue their aggressive actions, reportedly engaging in daily assaults that result in fatalities, cause harm to civilians, and destabilize regional peace and security, with the apparent objective of displacing local populations from their homes and land.
A Hezbollah lawmaker has alleged that the Israeli incident occurred as the committee overseeing the ceasefire agreement between Israel and Lebanon was gathering in the southern Lebanese town of Naqoura.
MP Fadlallah stated to Al-Manar that this development reaffirms the notion that the Israeli adversary disregards any form of commitment.
Upon entrusting the issue to the Lebanese authorities, it became evident that the adversary reverted to tactics reminiscent of the 1970s and 1980s, a period predating the resistance’s establishment of strategic frameworks with the Zionist entity.
He stated that individuals placed their trust in the resistance due to its role in providing them with protection.
When the responsibility fell to the state, this protection was no longer accessible.
